Raving Is A Lifestyle Essays - Drug Culture, Electronic Music

Raving Is A Lifestyle Raving Is a Lifestyle. One of the most rapidly expanding scenes in the world is raving. The dictionary defines Rave as To utter in madness or frenzy; to say wildly; as, to rave nonsense, which makes you wonder why raves were ever called raves to begin with, unless of course you have been to one. I will never forget my first experience at a rave. Media portrays Raves as cesspools of filth, sex and drugs, so naturally I was very nervous about attending my first party. We sit in a circle inside the party with the lights and music assailing my senses and take out the pills. I stare at mine and sweat nervously. I have never really done drugs before, and I am going to put a pill in my mouth that someone that I do not know has manufactured in their basement. Little did I know that this was a common theme in the scene, quality control for basement pharmaceuticals is a difficult thing. I down the ecstasy and wait nervously for some thing to happen to feel something that had been extensively described to me, but for which I still had no idea what to expect for words can do it no justice. After forty minutes, I start to stand up to get some water, and before I know what is going on, I am already standing. It feels like I have no joints in my body, and everything is fluid. My mind is rushing and I let this sense of pure energy, goodwill and friendliness wash over my body. I feel the need for something different and wander off to make some new friends. I sit to talk to a beautiful girl by a pillar. Normally, I would be very shy and never dream of talking to a goddess such as she. Before I know what is going on, I am laying on my back with my head in her lap and she is massaging my face and neck gently, her touch so light that there seems to be almost no touch, just energy passing from her fingers to my face. I start to imagine strange worlds in my minds eye, seemingly rendered by computers full of brilliant glow-stick colors like fluorescent blues, purples and greens, and there are strange creatu res dancing and racing about. Now this total stranger is kissing me very very softly, and I am lost in space and time, I can no longer feel the floor beneath my body and the images I see are more vivid, the moment lasting for eternity. Soon we break apart and I give her a warm hug and we go our separate ways, her name already forgotten in the sensory overload that I am riding. Imaging five thousand people all experiencing the same thing that I did for eight hours and it is not hard to imagine how an entire culture could be based on these parties. When I finally came down from the ecstasy later the next day, everything I knew about the world seemed to have changed. From that day on, the grass has seemed greener, the breeze feels more soothing and I have noticed and appreciated more of the simple pleasures in life more than I ever had before. Peace, Love, Unity, and Respect. P.L.U.R. is the Raver code that, if everyone lived by, the world would be infinitely better than it is today. When you were young, your mom probably told you that to be accepted by everyone you had to be yourself. As time goes by, most people forget what it is to be their self and build up attitudes, fronts, and inhibitions that become their accepted personality. The Rave culture is so popular because when people are on ecstasy, which is by far the drug of choice for partiers, they have no up attitudes, fronts, and inhibitions and you get to see the raw personality underneath. Imagine a party with four to twenty thousand people oozing friendliness and goodwill, with no social inhibitions all dying to meet you, and it is not hard to see why this culture is so popular. Since my first party I have continued to rave

Reviewers and Peer Reviewers For Sample Essays

Reviewers and Peer Reviewers For Sample EssaysAfter reading the article 'Sample Essay - The Only Easy Way to Write a Public Speech Sample,' I have an opinion about how many organizations do a proper peer review of sample essays. Now, some organizations feel they do not need to do a peer review, as everyone that submits a proposal knows what the submission guidelines are. In other words, if you want to submit your peer review paper, then you should do so.I am not speaking of private salesmen or business people. I am speaking of doctors, attorneys, accountants, business owners, professors, university administrators, etc. They must know their work is up for review by peers before they submit it. If the proper review process did not take place, the bottom line would be that the projects of the good scientists and business people will be given to people who do not have the necessary skills or the essential background to complete the work or complete the project.Of course, they are not all aware of the fact that the project manager for the project is also an expert in that area. I am aware of some projects where the project manager may have little knowledge or experience in the area of the project and the review by peers is due to the fact that they have knowledge about the area and they understand the proposal very well. However, these individuals know that this review process is in place for one reason only, to check that the work of the expert has been given due consideration.In another scenario, the private salesperson will never do the peer review of the project, because he wants to make a sale. He would never trust his project to an outside person to review his sales material. I do not think there is anything wrong with the sales materials, but it does not necessarily mean that the project manager and the salesperson should not consider each other as part of the peer review.After the reviewer has approved the project, the project manager can submit the project. I believe the focus should be on the safety and integrity of the project. In the same manner, when you receive the document for your review, the number one thing you need to look at is, do I agree with the reviewer? As long as the project has not been signed off on by the review, it is not in the same category as a peer review and should not be given the same scrutiny.At that point, the sample essay should be given to the expert for his assessment and comments. However, I feel it is good for the expert to be able to check out the project from the viewpoint of the overall design, as this will help to determine if the project can be made much more interesting to the end reader. While the review process is important, it must be balanced with the needs of the project.If it is obvious that a peer review was not done, then it can cause the entire project to fail. Instead of simply looking at the content, you may find that the project was actually much better than you had expected or want ed. However, I would always take the project back to the experts for their input on any revisions.If you are a private author, then you should always read the opinion from the experts that have an expertise in the area of your project. In addition, you should make sure that they are as objective as possible in their review of the sample essay. This is to make sure the reviewer truly understands the project, its requirements, and the amount of time it will take to complete the project.

Diffusion of innovation

Diffusion of innovation describes how a new idea, behavior, or item (an innovation) is disseminated to a population in a given period of time through specific avenues of communication (Rogers, 2003). Innovations are not always adopted even when they have obvious and clear-cut advantages and Rogers (2003) identifies four factors of diffusion: time, the social system, the innovation, and the communication channels.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Diffusion of innovation specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More For something to qualify as an innovation it does not have to be temporally recent as what matters is that people perceive it as new. An innovation therefore is that which is perceived as new regardless of its actual age. A communication channel refers to the course a message takes to get from a source to the receiver and examples are interpersonal communication and mass media. Time is a factor when it comes to the r ate of adoption of an innovation and it forms an imperative element in understanding diffusion of innovations. The social system can be viewed as people who jointly seek a common goal. The decision to take up an innovation usually involves five steps: knowledge, persuasion, decision, implementation, and confirmation. The knowledge stage is characterized by someone gaining initial information on what purpose the innovation serves and how it functions, albeit the information is sparse at this stage. During the persuasion stage the person actively seeks information on the innovation and forms an independent opinion about the innovation. Rogers (2003) points out that persuasions are more affective than objective-they are based more on feelings than actual factual information. The decision stage marks the point at which someone decides whether or not to adopt an innovation for their own use. In the implementation stage the person puts the innovation to actual practical use. Confirmation is the final stage and it involves the person making an evaluation of the decision to use the innovation. The stage is also marked by seeking of information that is of a bolstering nature in order to confirm their decision and keep using the innovation. The success of an innovation is usually determined by five aspects: relative advantage, simplicity and ease of use, compatibility with existing values and practices, trialability and observability (Bennet and Bennet, 2003). Relative advantage is subjective to the users of an innovation and it is the perceived â€Å"betterness† of an innovation to its predecessor.Advertising Looking for essay on social sciences? Let's see if we can help you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More Simplicity and ease of use determine the rate of an innovation’s diffusion in the sense that innovations that are easy to understand and use are likely to have a faster rate of adoption. The extent to which an innovation is c onsistent with current needs and is significant to its users determines the innovation’s compatibility with existing values and practices. An innovation that is highly relevant to the social system is likely to have a higher rate of diffusion. Trialabilty is the degree to which an innovation can be tested by the potential user before the user adopts it e.g. a car that can be taken for a test drive has more trialability than the car which cannot. Observability is basically how perceptible the results of an innovation are. Each social system can be broken down to five categories: innovators, early adopter, late adopters, and laggards depending on how quickly each group chooses to adopt an innovation. Innovators are the quickest and laggards the slowest to adopt an innovation. The graph below is a representation of how the groups’ frequencies are broken down in a population. Figure 1. Frequency distribution of a population according to rate of innovation adoption. This f igure illustrates how the five categories of innovation adoption according to time are spread in a population. References Bennett, J., Bennett, L. (2003). A Review of Factors that Influence the Diffusion of Innovation when Structuring a Faculty Training Program. Internet and Higher Education ,6, 53-63. Rogers, E. M (2003). Diffusion of Innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Advertising We will write a custom essay sample on Diffusion of innovation specifically for you for only $16.05 $11/page Learn More This essay on Diffusion of innovation was written and submitted by user Carissa E. to help you with your own studies. You are free to use it for research and reference purposes in order to write your own paper; however, you must cite it accordingly. You can donate your paper here.